Do you have a user manual?

Transparency about how we work and learn, our preferences, values, beliefs, likes and dislikes, ultimately shortens the learning curve for your colleagues by making explicit the things that often take many years to learn through trial and error. A critical and candid self-reflection via the creation of a user manual is one way to practice radical candour and transparent leadership. A user manual is not static; rather it is a living piece of writing that captures a moment in time and articulates that you will always be a work in progress.

Inspired by the work of Adam Bryant and Kim Scott, this self-reflective exercise can serve as a prompt in identifying specific areas for personal growth, or it could be an activity a leadership team performs together as a discussion starter on how to become a more effective team.

Bryant recommends asking yourself questions like,

“Which activities give me energy, and which deplete me? What are my unique abilities, and how do I maximize the time I spend expressing them? What do people misunderstand about me, and why?”

Here is my first attempt.

I used to wag finger painting in Kinder so I guess I have always been a bit rebellious.

I identify with the tenants of progressive education but believe that there is always a place to learn directly from the instruction of others.

Your teaching style matters less to me than your attitude and dispositions toward the profession.

I enjoy exercise. In fact, I need it. Often I will squeeze in a run or a gym session on my lunch break. I make this a priority by scheduling it into my day and find that I am 100% more productive in the afternoons if I do.

I am constantly reflecting and learning. I value doing over perfection. I do not always know what I am doing and sometimes lack confidence, but I accept that, and just let my bias toward action guide me. I am committed to continuous improvement.

I have a diverse range of interests and believe that one of the best things you can bring to the workplace is a multitude of various and varied life experiences.

I believe in giving people freedom to do what they do best and then support in whatever way I can.

Intellectual stimulation energizes me. I enjoy turning challenges into opportunities. I enjoy working with people who are open to ideas and can explore possibilities.

Saying ‘thank you’ goes a long way.

I do not have patience for over-analysis of non-important issues and sometimes being in a discussion about semantics frustrates me. I also dislike grandstanding. If you have an issue come and see me and we can work through it. Do not wait until a public forum to air your concerns or issues for the first time.

I am fiercely loyal but if my confidence is broken it is hard to repair. Be open and honest, communicate with me and treat people around you in a friendly and professional way. When communicating I like to get to the point. I also like others to do the same. Please don’t talk in riddles. Say what you mean. Be yourself. Challenge and disagree with me because I value this. But please be respectful.

Communicating face to face with me is preferred, but sometimes if you require a thoughtful and considered response, an email can also work. I appreciate people telling me what I need to know, not what you think I want to hear.

I’m often working on many different projects so appreciate help making sure all the details are covered, and flagging for me any that need my attention.

Have empathy for others, as you never know the struggles they are going through.

I value difference and believe in diversity. High functioning teams have a range of experiences, expertise, skillsets and mindsets.

I want every member of my team to feel valued and empowered. I want you to feel supported in your quest to be a better version of yourself, because I believe we can all be better. 

This is not exhaustive by any stretch and still needs a bit of work, but it is something I look forward to revising and revisiting regularly.

LMS Evaluation & Selection

We have the great fortune of having some talented developers on staff. Many of our ICT platforms over the years have been custom developed to suit our needs at any given time. However, the reality of this current landscape, whilst operational, utilizes many disparate systems that lack cohesiveness, integration and certainly timely access to student data profiles.

Our College ICT Strategic Plan outlines the provision of a secure and integrated student information system that provides access to student learning information throughout a student’s life at the school, including learning pathways, assessment, reporting and data on student wellbeing. A recent review led to the development of a strategic intent that supports the internal business drivers and demands from external influences, but also sees us aim to increase the knowledge we have of our students, to increase the level of communication between home and school and to gain efficiencies by reducing the overall complexity of our systems and processes.

This has meant us adopting a new Learning Management System (LMS) for 2018. Our LMS evaluation and selection process took place over a twelve-month period (yes you read that right) and involved five major steps: needs analysis, requirements definition, product evaluation, staff consultation and product selection.

The market is saturated with different products including Schoolbox, Canvas, Schoology, Edumate, Moodle & SEQTA. We have decided to go with SEQTA.

All staff across our College had the opportunity to view a demonstration of different platforms on multiple occasions. This followed by opportunities to provide feedback that has informed the process at different levels. Although this is a time consuming process, involving staff in the evaluation process results in them having greater ownership of the resulting decision. No matter how much you communicate and consult however, you will still have some staff who are critical of the process. Identifying and engaging with critical staff and having them involved right from the outset is something I would definitely advocate for those going down a similar path.

These platforms often promote conformity and tie you to a single way of doing things. This is problematic considering that my modus operandi is to promote bottom-up innovation and to encourage people to use the tools and resources that work best for them. That being said, I think there is a nice middle ground when an LMS provides a central repository for attendance, welfare, analytics & continuous reporting, but doesn’t require the use of the course creation modules.

For those going down a similar path I have included below a copy of our LMS Research Timeline and proposed implementation plan for our preferred platform SEQTA.

Reach out for a discussion if you are doing something similar.